<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Business Law Daily</title>
	<atom:link href="http://businesslawdaily.net/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://businesslawdaily.net</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 19:54:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Mirena IUD Lawsuit Update: Judge Calls for More Input from Female Lawyers, Notes Rottenstein Law Group LLP</title>
		<link>http://businesslawdaily.net/health-news/mirena-iud-lawsuit-update-judge-calls-for-more-input-from-female-lawyers-notes-rottenstein-law-group-llp/</link>
		<comments>http://businesslawdaily.net/health-news/mirena-iud-lawsuit-update-judge-calls-for-more-input-from-female-lawyers-notes-rottenstein-law-group-llp/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 19:54:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Linda Tara</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Health News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://businesslawdaily.net/?p=390</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The firm is actively filing Mirena IUD lawsuits on behalf of those who allegedly suffered serious Mirena side effects as a result of implantation of the device. &#160; The judge overseeing pretrial proceedings in the federal consolidation of Mirena IUD lawsuits has called specifically for female lawyers to be included in a plaintiffs’ leadership committee, [...]</p><p>The post <a href="http://businesslawdaily.net/health-news/mirena-iud-lawsuit-update-judge-calls-for-more-input-from-female-lawyers-notes-rottenstein-law-group-llp/">Mirena IUD Lawsuit Update: Judge Calls for More Input from Female Lawyers, Notes Rottenstein Law Group LLP</a> appeared first on <a href="http://businesslawdaily.net">Business Law Daily</a>.</p>]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: justify;">The firm is actively filing Mirena IUD lawsuits on behalf of those who allegedly suffered serious Mirena side effects as a result of implantation of the device.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">The judge overseeing pretrial proceedings in the federal consolidation of Mirena IUD lawsuits has called specifically for female lawyers to be included in a plaintiffs’ leadership committee, according to Reuters.* The Rottenstein Law Group LLP acknowledges the judge’s request, noting that its <a href="http://www.mirenalawsuit.us/" target="_blank">lawyers can help with Mirena lawsuits</a> by providing information on Mirena side effects and how to file a lawsuit.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Judge Cathy Seibel called for the addition of some female lawyers to the committee. This followed requests from at least one plaintiff’s attorney that women be represented on the committee because, according to Reuters, “female attorneys could relate to [plaintiffs’] challenges and promote that empathy to a judge or jury.”</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Read full story at PRWeb.com: <a href="http://www.prweb.com/releases/mirena-side-effects/mirena-lawsuit/prweb10751614.htm" target="_blank">Mirena IUD Lawsuit Update: Judge Calls for More Input from Female Lawyers, Notes Rottenstein Law Group LLP</a></p>
<p>The post <a href="http://businesslawdaily.net/health-news/mirena-iud-lawsuit-update-judge-calls-for-more-input-from-female-lawyers-notes-rottenstein-law-group-llp/">Mirena IUD Lawsuit Update: Judge Calls for More Input from Female Lawyers, Notes Rottenstein Law Group LLP</a> appeared first on <a href="http://businesslawdaily.net">Business Law Daily</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://businesslawdaily.net/health-news/mirena-iud-lawsuit-update-judge-calls-for-more-input-from-female-lawyers-notes-rottenstein-law-group-llp/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>DePuy Announces It Will Stop Selling Metal-On-Metal Hip Implants, Notes Rottenstein Law Group LLP</title>
		<link>http://businesslawdaily.net/business/depuy-announces-it-will-stop-selling-metal-on-metal-hip-implants-notes-rottenstein-law-group-llp/</link>
		<comments>http://businesslawdaily.net/business/depuy-announces-it-will-stop-selling-metal-on-metal-hip-implants-notes-rottenstein-law-group-llp/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 18:31:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Linda Tara</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://businesslawdaily.net/?p=385</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The firm is actively filing DePuy ASR lawsuits on behalf of those who allegedly suffered metallosis, premature device failure, or other serious complications related to the 2010 DePuy ASR recall. (PRWEB) May 17, 2013 Johnson &#38; Johnson subsidiary DePuy Orthopaedics announced on May 16 that it will stop sales of metal-on-metal hip replacements. This comes [...]</p><p>The post <a href="http://businesslawdaily.net/business/depuy-announces-it-will-stop-selling-metal-on-metal-hip-implants-notes-rottenstein-law-group-llp/">DePuy Announces It Will Stop Selling Metal-On-Metal Hip Implants, Notes Rottenstein Law Group LLP</a> appeared first on <a href="http://businesslawdaily.net">Business Law Daily</a>.</p>]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: justify;">The firm is actively filing DePuy ASR lawsuits on behalf of those who allegedly suffered metallosis, premature device failure, or other serious complications related to the 2010 DePuy ASR recall.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">(PRWEB) May 17, 2013</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Johnson &amp; Johnson subsidiary DePuy Orthopaedics announced on May 16 that it will stop sales of metal-on-metal hip replacements. This comes after the company saw the market for the products drop significantly* amid lawsuits and calls for increased regulation,** and after the 2010 recall of the DePuy ASR hip implant. The Rottenstein Law Group LLP, a metal-on-metal hip implant law firm, applauds the decision to remove these products from the market and notes that it maintains a comprehensive website at <a href="http://www.hipreplacementlawsuitcenter.com" target="_blank">http://www.hipreplacementlawsuitcenter.com</a> with information on the metal-on-metal hip products from a variety of companies facing increased scrutiny.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Johnson &amp; Johnson said its decision to stop selling the metal liners in the Ultamet Metal-on-Metal Articulation and Complete Ceramic-on-Metal Acetabular Hip System was because of decreased demand and not because of the safety concerns cited by the FDA regarding metal-on-metal hips or the more than 10,000 lawsuits pending against DePuy over the ASR hip implant system (In re: DePuy Orthopaedics Inc., ASR Hip Implant Products Liability Litigation, MDL-2197 (U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Ohio)), according to a May 16 Bloomberg report. The company will continue to sell its DePuy Pinnacle system, though.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Read full story at PRWeb.com: <a href="http://www.prweb.com/releases/depuy-recall/hip-implant-lawsuit/prweb10746092.htm" target="_blank">DePuy Announces It Will Stop Selling Metal-On-Metal Hip Implants, Notes Rottenstein Law Group LLP</a></p>
<p>The post <a href="http://businesslawdaily.net/business/depuy-announces-it-will-stop-selling-metal-on-metal-hip-implants-notes-rottenstein-law-group-llp/">DePuy Announces It Will Stop Selling Metal-On-Metal Hip Implants, Notes Rottenstein Law Group LLP</a> appeared first on <a href="http://businesslawdaily.net">Business Law Daily</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://businesslawdaily.net/business/depuy-announces-it-will-stop-selling-metal-on-metal-hip-implants-notes-rottenstein-law-group-llp/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Rottenstein Law Group LLP Acknowledges Study That Raises Questions About Use of Vaginal Mesh For Prolapse Repair</title>
		<link>http://businesslawdaily.net/health-news/rottenstein-law-group-llp-acknowledges-study-that-raises-questions-about-use-of-vaginal-mesh-for-prolapse-repair/</link>
		<comments>http://businesslawdaily.net/health-news/rottenstein-law-group-llp-acknowledges-study-that-raises-questions-about-use-of-vaginal-mesh-for-prolapse-repair/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 20:27:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Linda Tara</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Health News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://businesslawdaily.net/?p=383</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The firm is currently offering vaginal mesh lawsuit evaluations to women who allege they sustained injuries from vaginal mesh implants. &#160; The Rottenstein Law Group LLP, a New York-based law firm that represents hundreds of plaintiffs in transvaginal mesh lawsuits, acknowledges a study comparing the results of pelvic prolapse repair using vaginal mesh and native [...]</p><p>The post <a href="http://businesslawdaily.net/health-news/rottenstein-law-group-llp-acknowledges-study-that-raises-questions-about-use-of-vaginal-mesh-for-prolapse-repair/">Rottenstein Law Group LLP Acknowledges Study That Raises Questions About Use of Vaginal Mesh For Prolapse Repair</a> appeared first on <a href="http://businesslawdaily.net">Business Law Daily</a>.</p>]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: justify;">The firm is currently offering vaginal mesh lawsuit evaluations to women who allege they sustained injuries from vaginal mesh implants.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">The Rottenstein Law Group LLP, a New York-based law firm that represents hundreds of plaintiffs in <a href="http://www.vaginalmeshlawsuitcenter.us/" target="_blank">transvaginal mesh lawsuits</a>, acknowledges a study comparing the results of pelvic prolapse repair using vaginal mesh and native tissue.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">The results of a prospective randomized trial, which were reported by Dr. Robert E. Gutman at the annual meeting of the Society of Gynecologic Surgeons, showed that cure rates and patient satisfaction following pelvic prolapse repair were similar at three-year follow-up regardless of whether vaginal mesh or native tissue was used for the repair, according to the May 9, 2013, article in Ob.Gyn.News that reported on the study.* That article further reports that, “subjects treated with mesh had more complications without experiencing benefit beyond that observed in the native tissue repair patients.”</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Read full story at PRWeb.com: <a href="http://www.prweb.com/releases/transvaginal-mesh-lawsuit/pelvic-prolapse/prweb10732030.htm" target="_blank">Rottenstein Law Group LLP Acknowledges Study That Raises Questions About Use of Vaginal Mesh For Prolapse Repair</a></p>
<p>The post <a href="http://businesslawdaily.net/health-news/rottenstein-law-group-llp-acknowledges-study-that-raises-questions-about-use-of-vaginal-mesh-for-prolapse-repair/">Rottenstein Law Group LLP Acknowledges Study That Raises Questions About Use of Vaginal Mesh For Prolapse Repair</a> appeared first on <a href="http://businesslawdaily.net">Business Law Daily</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://businesslawdaily.net/health-news/rottenstein-law-group-llp-acknowledges-study-that-raises-questions-about-use-of-vaginal-mesh-for-prolapse-repair/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The firm is currently evaluating Byetta lawsuits for those who have suffered from allegedly serious Byetta side effects.</title>
		<link>http://businesslawdaily.net/health-news/the-firm-is-currently-evaluating-byetta-lawsuits-for-those-who-have-suffered-from-allegedly-serious-byetta-side-effects/</link>
		<comments>http://businesslawdaily.net/health-news/the-firm-is-currently-evaluating-byetta-lawsuits-for-those-who-have-suffered-from-allegedly-serious-byetta-side-effects/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 16:36:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Linda Tara</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Health News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://businesslawdaily.net/?p=381</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>On May 9 a woman filed a lawsuit against drug makers Amylin Pharmaceuticals and Eli Lilly in federal court, alleging that the companies failed to adequately warn her about type 2 diabetes drug Byetta’s link to thyroid cancer, according to court documents for Childress v. Amylin Pharmaceuticals LLC, et al., No. 3:13-1114 (U.S. District Court [...]</p><p>The post <a href="http://businesslawdaily.net/health-news/the-firm-is-currently-evaluating-byetta-lawsuits-for-those-who-have-suffered-from-allegedly-serious-byetta-side-effects/">The firm is currently evaluating Byetta lawsuits for those who have suffered from allegedly serious Byetta side effects.</a> appeared first on <a href="http://businesslawdaily.net">Business Law Daily</a>.</p>]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: justify;">On May 9 a woman filed a lawsuit against drug makers Amylin Pharmaceuticals and Eli Lilly in federal court, alleging that the companies failed to adequately warn her about type 2 diabetes drug Byetta’s link to thyroid cancer, according to court documents for Childress v. Amylin Pharmaceuticals LLC, et al., No. 3:13-1114 (U.S. District Court for the Southern District of California). The Rottenstein Law Group LLP maintains a Byetta Lawsuits Center at<a href="http://www.byettalawsuits.us/">http://www.byettalawsuits.us</a>, which features comprehensive information about the drug and steps that need to be taken to file a lawsuit.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">
<p style="text-align: justify;">Elizabeth Childress was prescribed Byetta in January 2007 to treat her type 2 diabetes, and continued to take it through August of that year, according to court documents. In May 2011 she was diagnosed with thyroid cancer and attributes it to her use of Byetta, a drug that has also been linked to both thyroid cancer and pancreatic cancer in women.* Childress alleges that the drug makers were aware of the risks but did not notify patients of them.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">
<p style="text-align: justify;">“It is important that the drug makers are held accountable, if the allegations are true,” said Rochelle Rottenstein, principal of the Rottenstein Law Group LLP.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">
<p style="text-align: justify;">Read more: <a href="http://www.prweb.com/releases/byetta-diabetes/byetta-side-effects/prweb10729549.htm">Byetta Lawsuit News: Woman Alleges Her Thyroid Cancer Is Linked to Byetta Use, Rottenstein Law Group LLP Reports</a></p>
<p>The post <a href="http://businesslawdaily.net/health-news/the-firm-is-currently-evaluating-byetta-lawsuits-for-those-who-have-suffered-from-allegedly-serious-byetta-side-effects/">The firm is currently evaluating Byetta lawsuits for those who have suffered from allegedly serious Byetta side effects.</a> appeared first on <a href="http://businesslawdaily.net">Business Law Daily</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://businesslawdaily.net/health-news/the-firm-is-currently-evaluating-byetta-lawsuits-for-those-who-have-suffered-from-allegedly-serious-byetta-side-effects/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Lipitor Lawsuit News: US Spending on Drugs Fell For First Time in 2012, Notes Rottenstein Law Group LLP</title>
		<link>http://businesslawdaily.net/legal-news/lipitor-lawsuit-news-us-spending-on-drugs-fell-for-first-time-in-2012-notes-rottenstein-law-group-llp/</link>
		<comments>http://businesslawdaily.net/legal-news/lipitor-lawsuit-news-us-spending-on-drugs-fell-for-first-time-in-2012-notes-rottenstein-law-group-llp/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 12:39:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Linda Tara</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Legal News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://businesslawdaily.net/?p=379</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The firm is currently offering Lipitor lawsuit evaluations to those who have suffered from allegedly serious Lipitor side effects. (PRWEB) May 09, 2013 For the first time in 55 years, spending on medications in the United States has dropped, in part because of patent expirations for popular drugs such as Lipitor.* The Rottenstein Law Group [...]</p><p>The post <a href="http://businesslawdaily.net/legal-news/lipitor-lawsuit-news-us-spending-on-drugs-fell-for-first-time-in-2012-notes-rottenstein-law-group-llp/">Lipitor Lawsuit News: US Spending on Drugs Fell For First Time in 2012, Notes Rottenstein Law Group LLP</a> appeared first on <a href="http://businesslawdaily.net">Business Law Daily</a>.</p>]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: justify;">The firm is currently offering Lipitor lawsuit evaluations to those who have suffered from allegedly serious Lipitor side effects.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">(PRWEB) May 09, 2013</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">For the first time in 55 years, spending on medications in the United States has dropped, in part because of patent expirations for popular drugs such as Lipitor.* The Rottenstein Law Group LLP, a Lipitor law firm, offers its opinion on what this means for those who seek to file Lipitor lawsuits because they suffered from Lipitor-induced diabetes.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Pfizer lost patent protection for Lipitor in 2011, which led to other manufacturers’ selling cheaper generic versions of the drug. Given the great number of Lipitor users, that switch to generic plays a large role in reduced spending, according to a May 9 Reuters report.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Read more: <a href="http://www.prweb.com/releases/lipitor-recall/side-effects-lipitor/prweb10719174.htm">Lipitor Lawsuit News: US Spending on Drugs Fell For First Time in 2012, Notes Rottenstein Law Group LLP</a></p>
<p>The post <a href="http://businesslawdaily.net/legal-news/lipitor-lawsuit-news-us-spending-on-drugs-fell-for-first-time-in-2012-notes-rottenstein-law-group-llp/">Lipitor Lawsuit News: US Spending on Drugs Fell For First Time in 2012, Notes Rottenstein Law Group LLP</a> appeared first on <a href="http://businesslawdaily.net">Business Law Daily</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://businesslawdaily.net/legal-news/lipitor-lawsuit-news-us-spending-on-drugs-fell-for-first-time-in-2012-notes-rottenstein-law-group-llp/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Lipitor Lawsuit News: Rottenstein Law Group LLP Comments on Lipitor’s Possible Link to Diabetes Risk</title>
		<link>http://businesslawdaily.net/legal-news/lipitor-lawsuit-news-rottenstein-law-group-llp-comments-on-lipitors-possible-link-to-diabetes-risk/</link>
		<comments>http://businesslawdaily.net/legal-news/lipitor-lawsuit-news-rottenstein-law-group-llp-comments-on-lipitors-possible-link-to-diabetes-risk/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 May 2013 21:58:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Linda Tara</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Legal News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://businesslawdaily.net/?p=377</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The firm is currently offering Lipitor lawsuit evaluations to women who have suffered from allegedly serious Lipitor side effects. (PRWEB) May 13, 2013 The popular statin Lipitor has been the focus of a number of research studies, some of which have found a possible link between the drug and an increased risk of type 2 [...]</p><p>The post <a href="http://businesslawdaily.net/legal-news/lipitor-lawsuit-news-rottenstein-law-group-llp-comments-on-lipitors-possible-link-to-diabetes-risk/">Lipitor Lawsuit News: Rottenstein Law Group LLP Comments on Lipitor’s Possible Link to Diabetes Risk</a> appeared first on <a href="http://businesslawdaily.net">Business Law Daily</a>.</p>]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: justify;">The firm is currently offering Lipitor lawsuit evaluations to women who have suffered from allegedly serious Lipitor side effects.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">(PRWEB) May 13, 2013</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">The popular statin Lipitor has been the focus of a number of research studies, some of which have found a possible link between the drug and an increased risk of type 2 diabetes in women who use Lipitor to help lower their cholesterol levels, according to Reuters.* The Rottenstein Law Group LLP, a Lipitor law firm, offers its opinion on what the studies mean for those who have suffered from diabetes allegedly caused by Lipitor and who wish to file a Lipitor lawsuit.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">A 2011 study published in the Journal of the American College of Cardiology found that those at risk of getting diabetes were more likely to be diagnosed with the disease when they were using Lipitor, a statin prescribed to reduce high cholesterol in patients, according to Reuters. Another study, published in the January 2012 edition of JAMA: Internal Medicine, indicated that there is a potential link between statins and a type 2 diabetes risk in women.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Read more: <a href="http://www.prweb.com/releases/side-effects-lipitor/lipitor-recall/prweb10723107.htm">Lipitor Lawsuit News: Rottenstein Law Group LLP Comments on Lipitor’s Possible Link to Diabetes Risk </a></p>
<p>The post <a href="http://businesslawdaily.net/legal-news/lipitor-lawsuit-news-rottenstein-law-group-llp-comments-on-lipitors-possible-link-to-diabetes-risk/">Lipitor Lawsuit News: Rottenstein Law Group LLP Comments on Lipitor’s Possible Link to Diabetes Risk</a> appeared first on <a href="http://businesslawdaily.net">Business Law Daily</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://businesslawdaily.net/legal-news/lipitor-lawsuit-news-rottenstein-law-group-llp-comments-on-lipitors-possible-link-to-diabetes-risk/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>NuvaRing Lawsuit News: Rottenstein Law Group Responds to Judge’s Refusal to Dismiss Punitive Damages Claims</title>
		<link>http://businesslawdaily.net/legal-news/nuvaring-lawsuit-news-rottenstein-law-group-responds-to-judges-refusal-to-dismiss-punitive-damages-claims/</link>
		<comments>http://businesslawdaily.net/legal-news/nuvaring-lawsuit-news-rottenstein-law-group-responds-to-judges-refusal-to-dismiss-punitive-damages-claims/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 May 2013 19:11:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Linda Tara</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Legal News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://businesslawdaily.net/?p=375</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Two weeks after a judge threw out seven bellwether NuvaRing lawsuits, plaintiffs scored a win on May 3 in the New Jersey multicounty litigation consolidation when a judge refused to dismiss punitive damages claims in nine bellwether NuvaRing lawsuits, according to court documents. The Rottenstein Law Group, a NuvaRing law firm, offers its opinion on [...]</p><p>The post <a href="http://businesslawdaily.net/legal-news/nuvaring-lawsuit-news-rottenstein-law-group-responds-to-judges-refusal-to-dismiss-punitive-damages-claims/">NuvaRing Lawsuit News: Rottenstein Law Group Responds to Judge’s Refusal to Dismiss Punitive Damages Claims</a> appeared first on <a href="http://businesslawdaily.net">Business Law Daily</a>.</p>]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Two weeks after a judge threw out seven bellwether NuvaRing lawsuits, plaintiffs scored a win on May 3 in the New Jersey multicounty litigation consolidation when a judge refused to dismiss punitive damages claims in nine bellwether NuvaRing lawsuits, according to court documents. The Rottenstein Law Group, a NuvaRing law firm, offers its opinion on the developments and notes that it operates a case information site that features a comprehensive history of the contraceptive device, in addition to how to go about filing a lawsuit.</p>
<p>(PRWEB) May 06, 2013</p>
<p>Two weeks after a judge threw out seven bellwether NuvaRing lawsuits, plaintiffs scored a win on May 3 in the New Jersey multicounty litigation consolidation when a judge refused to dismiss punitive damages claims in nine bellwether NuvaRing lawsuits, according to court documents. The Rottenstein Law Group, a <a href="http://www.nuvaring-lawsuit.com/">NuvaRing law firm</a>, offers its opinion on the developments and notes that it operates a case information site that features a comprehensive history of the contraceptive device, in addition to how to go about filing a lawsuit.</p>
<p>Attorneys for medical device manufacturers Merck and Organon USA argued that punitive damages could not be sought in New Jersey because the state’s Product Liability Act excludes punitive damages in prescription drug litigation, according to court documents in In re: NuvaRing Litigation (BER-L-3081-09, Superior Court of New Jersey, Bergen County). Judge Brian R. Martinotti said the cases are primarily concerned with what the companies revealed to the plaintiffs and their doctors in each of the respective states—not what was disclosed to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration in warning labels issued from the companies’ headquarters in New Jersey. This, he said, meant that each of those respective states had an interest in regulating punitive damages differently.</p>
<p>Read more:  <a href="http://www.prweb.com/releases/side-effects-nuvaring/nuvaring-birth-control/prweb10704689.htm">NuvaRing Lawsuit News: Rottenstein Law Group Responds to Judge’s Refusal to Dismiss Punitive Damages Claims  </a></p>
<p>The post <a href="http://businesslawdaily.net/legal-news/nuvaring-lawsuit-news-rottenstein-law-group-responds-to-judges-refusal-to-dismiss-punitive-damages-claims/">NuvaRing Lawsuit News: Rottenstein Law Group Responds to Judge’s Refusal to Dismiss Punitive Damages Claims</a> appeared first on <a href="http://businesslawdaily.net">Business Law Daily</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://businesslawdaily.net/legal-news/nuvaring-lawsuit-news-rottenstein-law-group-responds-to-judges-refusal-to-dismiss-punitive-damages-claims/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mirena IUD Lawsuit Update: Rottenstein Law Group Responds to FDA’s 47,000 Mirena Adverse Events Reports</title>
		<link>http://businesslawdaily.net/health/mirena-iud-lawsuit-update-rottenstein-law-group-responds-to-fdas-47000-mirena-adverse-events-reports/</link>
		<comments>http://businesslawdaily.net/health/mirena-iud-lawsuit-update-rottenstein-law-group-responds-to-fdas-47000-mirena-adverse-events-reports/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 May 2013 22:45:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Linda Tara</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[health]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://businesslawdaily.net/?p=373</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The Mirena IUD lawyers at the Rottenstein Law Group are troubled by recent news reported in AdverseEvents that the U.S. Food and Drug Administration has to date received more than 47,000 adverse event reports about Mirena side effects for the Bayer-manufactured hormonal contraceptive device. The most common side effects reported to the FDA include the [...]</p><p>The post <a href="http://businesslawdaily.net/health/mirena-iud-lawsuit-update-rottenstein-law-group-responds-to-fdas-47000-mirena-adverse-events-reports/">Mirena IUD Lawsuit Update: Rottenstein Law Group Responds to FDA’s 47,000 Mirena Adverse Events Reports</a> appeared first on <a href="http://businesslawdaily.net">Business Law Daily</a>.</p>]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Mirena IUD lawyers at the Rottenstein Law Group are troubled by recent news reported in AdverseEvents that the U.S. Food and Drug Administration has to date received more than 47,000 adverse event reports about <a href="http://www.mirenalawsuit.us/mirena-iud-carries-with-it-some-serious-side-effects/" target="_blank">Mirena side effects</a> for the Bayer-manufactured hormonal contraceptive device.</p>
<p>The most common side effects reported to the FDA include the expulsion of the device and the device dislocation (migration), according to a recent AdverseEvents Report. This is supported by a 2008 FDA report that mentions those alleged side effects, in addition to perforation of the uterine wall and pelvic inflammatory disease as primary potential issues.</p>
<p>“We file Mirena lawsuits daily for those who believe their intrauterine devices have harmed them,” said Rochelle Rottenstein, principal of the Rottenstein Law Group. “These reports could be valuable evidence for Mirena plaintiffs during trials.”</p>
<p>Read full story at PRWeb.com: <a href="http://www.prweb.com/releases/mirena-side-effects/mirena-lawsuit/prweb10715534.htm" target="_blank">Mirena IUD Lawsuit Update: Rottenstein Law Group Responds to FDA’s 47,000 Mirena Adverse Events Reports</a></p>
<p>The post <a href="http://businesslawdaily.net/health/mirena-iud-lawsuit-update-rottenstein-law-group-responds-to-fdas-47000-mirena-adverse-events-reports/">Mirena IUD Lawsuit Update: Rottenstein Law Group Responds to FDA’s 47,000 Mirena Adverse Events Reports</a> appeared first on <a href="http://businesslawdaily.net">Business Law Daily</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://businesslawdaily.net/health/mirena-iud-lawsuit-update-rottenstein-law-group-responds-to-fdas-47000-mirena-adverse-events-reports/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>DePuy ASR Lawsuit Update: Rottenstein Law Group Comments on Delay of Second Federal Trial</title>
		<link>http://businesslawdaily.net/legal-news/depuy-asr-lawsuit-update-rottenstein-law-group-comments-on-delay-of-second-federal-trial/</link>
		<comments>http://businesslawdaily.net/legal-news/depuy-asr-lawsuit-update-rottenstein-law-group-comments-on-delay-of-second-federal-trial/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 May 2013 18:29:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Linda Tara</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Legal News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://businesslawdaily.net/?p=369</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>(PRWEB) May 08, 2013 A federal judge recently issued an order postponing the second federal DePuy ASR bellwether trial from July to September, according to court documents. The Rottenstein Law Group, which offers information about the ASR hip implant and provides news updates on the product at http://www.depuyrecallnewscenter.com/lawsuits, offers insight into what this means for [...]</p><p>The post <a href="http://businesslawdaily.net/legal-news/depuy-asr-lawsuit-update-rottenstein-law-group-comments-on-delay-of-second-federal-trial/">DePuy ASR Lawsuit Update: Rottenstein Law Group Comments on Delay of Second Federal Trial</a> appeared first on <a href="http://businesslawdaily.net">Business Law Daily</a>.</p>]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: justify;">(PRWEB) May 08, 2013</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">A federal judge recently issued an order postponing the second federal DePuy ASR bellwether trial from July to September, according to court documents. The Rottenstein Law Group, which offers information about the ASR hip implant and provides news updates on the product at <a href="http://www.depuyrecallnewscenter.com/lawsuits" target="_blank">http://www.depuyrecallnewscenter.com/lawsuits</a>, offers insight into what this means for those looking to file DePuy lawsuits.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Judge David Katz issued the order on April 22, three days after the first ASR bellwether trial was pushed back from May to June, according to court documents in MDL-2197, U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Ohio.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">“Delays can happen,” said Rochelle Rottenstein, principal of the Rottenstein Law Group. “This does not mean that those who seek to file hip implant lawsuits should be concerned about retaining an attorney for alleged harms such as metal poisoning, pain and discomfort. Every victim can have his or her day in court if he or she wants it.&#8221;</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Read full story at PRWeb.com: <a href="http://www.prweb.com/releases/depuy-hip-replacement/depuy-recall/prweb10714338.htm" target="_blank">DePuy ASR Lawsuit Update: Rottenstein Law Group Comments on Delay of Second Federal Trial</a></p>
<p>The post <a href="http://businesslawdaily.net/legal-news/depuy-asr-lawsuit-update-rottenstein-law-group-comments-on-delay-of-second-federal-trial/">DePuy ASR Lawsuit Update: Rottenstein Law Group Comments on Delay of Second Federal Trial</a> appeared first on <a href="http://businesslawdaily.net">Business Law Daily</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://businesslawdaily.net/legal-news/depuy-asr-lawsuit-update-rottenstein-law-group-comments-on-delay-of-second-federal-trial/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mirena IUD Lawsuit Update: Rottenstein Law Group Concerned About Implications of Study That OKs Device’s Use in Teens</title>
		<link>http://businesslawdaily.net/health-news/mirena-iud-lawsuit-update-rottenstein-law-group-concerned-about-implications-of-study-that-oks-devices-use-in-teens/</link>
		<comments>http://businesslawdaily.net/health-news/mirena-iud-lawsuit-update-rottenstein-law-group-concerned-about-implications-of-study-that-oks-devices-use-in-teens/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 May 2013 14:43:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Linda Tara</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Health News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://businesslawdaily.net/?p=366</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The Mirena IUD lawyers at the Rottenstein Law Group are concerned about a new study* that approves of the use of the hormonal IUD in teens. The firm has received many calls from women who have had the IUD surgically removed because it became embedded in their uteruses. &#160; “We have filed lawsuits on behalf [...]</p><p>The post <a href="http://businesslawdaily.net/health-news/mirena-iud-lawsuit-update-rottenstein-law-group-concerned-about-implications-of-study-that-oks-devices-use-in-teens/">Mirena IUD Lawsuit Update: Rottenstein Law Group Concerned About Implications of Study That OKs Device’s Use in Teens</a> appeared first on <a href="http://businesslawdaily.net">Business Law Daily</a>.</p>]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: justify;">The Mirena IUD lawyers at the Rottenstein Law Group are concerned about a new study* that approves of the use of the hormonal IUD in teens. The firm has received many calls from women who have had the IUD surgically removed because it became <a href="http://www.mirenalawsuit.us/how-do-i-know-if-ive-been-injured-by-my-mirena-iud/" target="_blank">embedded in their uteruses</a>.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">“We have filed lawsuits on behalf of women who have experienced the Mirena IUD’s serious alleged side effects,” said Rochelle Rottenstein, principal of the Rottenstein Law Group. “I’m sure the researchers acted in good faith, but in our experience their findings do not tell the whole story. Regardless, all of these studies have the potential to be included as evidence in a trial.&#8221;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">The study, published in the May 2013 edition of the Obstetrics &amp; Gynecology medical journal, found that hormonal IUDs like Mirena were a better fit for teenagers than copper IUDs like the ParaGard. This is despite the fact that Mirena’s original target market was women who have had at least one child. In addition, women across the United States have filed lawsuits that have been consolidated at the federal level (In re: Mirena IUD Products Liability Litigation, MDL No. 2434, U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York) and in at least one state (In re: Application for Centralized Management of Certain Cases Involving Mirena, Morris County (N.J.) Superior Court).</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Read full story at PRWeb.com: <a href="http://www.prweb.com/releases/iud-mirena/mirena-side-effects/prweb10693864.htm" target="_blank">Mirena IUD Lawsuit Update: Rottenstein Law Group Concerned About Implications of Study That OKs Device’s Use in Teens</a></p>
<p>The post <a href="http://businesslawdaily.net/health-news/mirena-iud-lawsuit-update-rottenstein-law-group-concerned-about-implications-of-study-that-oks-devices-use-in-teens/">Mirena IUD Lawsuit Update: Rottenstein Law Group Concerned About Implications of Study That OKs Device’s Use in Teens</a> appeared first on <a href="http://businesslawdaily.net">Business Law Daily</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://businesslawdaily.net/health-news/mirena-iud-lawsuit-update-rottenstein-law-group-concerned-about-implications-of-study-that-oks-devices-use-in-teens/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
